So, the SECOND Blubber Boy Bill Barr 'bout to BUGGER Blubber Boy One, huh?
I've already mentioned that I have little use for "Roseanne" Barr-far as I'M concerned, the ONLY person who deserves to be hung for treason more than him is tRUMP, of course, and, maybe "General" Michael Flynn. But Flynn is still gulping down the tRUMP Kool Aid, and I'm hopeful that he will be among those indicted later this month by Georgia DA Willis (for a scorecard of the Scumbags, the courageous Cassidy Hutchinson excepted, see https://www.politico.com/news/2023/...ts-election-interference-key-players-00109050). But, probably to keep his fat ass outta the wringer, BB seems all too eager to lay the wood to his fellow traitor, so, that's gotta be worth SOMETHING, kinda like Mike Pence, when push came to shove, doing the right thing.
www.politico.com
SHARETWEET
Former U.S. Attorney General William Barr speaks at a meeting of the Federalist Society on September 20, 2022 in Washington, DC. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Former Attorney General Bill Barr said he is willing to testify against former President Trump at his Jan. 6 trial.
Barr, who was appointed by Trump, responded “of course” when asked on CBS’s “Face the Nation” if he would be willing to appear as a witness in Trump’s trial over federal charges related to alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election. He declined to answer whether he was interviewed by the special counsel in connection to the federal investigation.
Barr has been a staunch critic of the former president since he resigned from his post shortly after the 2020 election. He noted that the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith was a “challenging” one, but that he does not think it “runs afoul of the First Amendment.”
Six white former officers plead guilty in torture of two Black menTrump calls on Supreme Court to ‘intercede’ in legal fights
When asked about his interactions with Trump and how he told the former president there was no evidence of election fraud, Barr said that his investigations into the fraud “satisfied” the conclusions.
“Well, I go through that in my book in painstaking detail, but on three occasions at least, I told him in no uncertain terms, that there was no evidence of fraud that would have changed the outcome,” he said.
Trump was indicted last week over his attempts to stay in power after losing the 2020 presidential election to President Biden. In a 45-page indictment, the Justice Department alleges Trump engaged in a campaign of “dishonesty, fraud and conceit” to obstruct a “bedrock function” of a democracy. He pleaded not guilty to the charges Thursday.
I've already mentioned that I have little use for "Roseanne" Barr-far as I'M concerned, the ONLY person who deserves to be hung for treason more than him is tRUMP, of course, and, maybe "General" Michael Flynn. But Flynn is still gulping down the tRUMP Kool Aid, and I'm hopeful that he will be among those indicted later this month by Georgia DA Willis (for a scorecard of the Scumbags, the courageous Cassidy Hutchinson excepted, see https://www.politico.com/news/2023/...ts-election-interference-key-players-00109050). But, probably to keep his fat ass outta the wringer, BB seems all too eager to lay the wood to his fellow traitor, so, that's gotta be worth SOMETHING, kinda like Mike Pence, when push came to shove, doing the right thing.
2 more Trump indictments loom. Here are all the names to know.
As Jack Smith and Fani Willis finalize their investigations into election interference, a sprawling cast of characters may be swept up in the cases.
www.politico.com
Bill Barr says he’s willing to testify against Trump at Jan. 6 trial
BY LAUREN SFORZA - 08/06/23 11:17 AM ETSHARETWEET
Former U.S. Attorney General William Barr speaks at a meeting of the Federalist Society on September 20, 2022 in Washington, DC. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Former Attorney General Bill Barr said he is willing to testify against former President Trump at his Jan. 6 trial.
Barr, who was appointed by Trump, responded “of course” when asked on CBS’s “Face the Nation” if he would be willing to appear as a witness in Trump’s trial over federal charges related to alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election. He declined to answer whether he was interviewed by the special counsel in connection to the federal investigation.
Barr has been a staunch critic of the former president since he resigned from his post shortly after the 2020 election. He noted that the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith was a “challenging” one, but that he does not think it “runs afoul of the First Amendment.”
Six white former officers plead guilty in torture of two Black menTrump calls on Supreme Court to ‘intercede’ in legal fights
When asked about his interactions with Trump and how he told the former president there was no evidence of election fraud, Barr said that his investigations into the fraud “satisfied” the conclusions.
“Well, I go through that in my book in painstaking detail, but on three occasions at least, I told him in no uncertain terms, that there was no evidence of fraud that would have changed the outcome,” he said.
Trump was indicted last week over his attempts to stay in power after losing the 2020 presidential election to President Biden. In a 45-page indictment, the Justice Department alleges Trump engaged in a campaign of “dishonesty, fraud and conceit” to obstruct a “bedrock function” of a democracy. He pleaded not guilty to the charges Thursday.
